lydamorehouse: (Default)
There were a number of factors in my decision to go to WisCON virtually this year, but the main one was that I'd have to turn around almost immediately after returning home from a road trip to do another one. Even for someone like me who loves to road trip, that was too much.

However, as I've reported in the past, WisCON has run a good virtual con, so I had no hesitation dropping the very cheap virtual membership ($25) last minute in order to attend online. This year the virtual track consisted of a Discord with multiple channels, hybrid panels (basically in-person, but streamed to Zoom), and Zoom-only panels. 

I didn't do much of anything at the con on Friday because I was busy doing things with my family. However, I got a taste of Wiscon via an email from [personal profile] naomikritzer in which we chatted about the workshop critique group that she'd facilitated. Emailing with her reminded me of the one time I did the workshop as a facilitator... (I remember it well because [personal profile] davidlevine  was in my group and he was already so sufficiently advanced that the sum of my critique consisted of where to send "Tale of the Golden Eagle.")  I think I also did the workshop as a nascent writer being critiqued, but I have no idea when that might have been--sometime in the 1990s?? I was just browsing the list of GoHs, wondering if seeing a particular name would jog my memory and the only one that did was Melissa Scott, because I interviewed her for the local gay paper, focusPOINT, and sold the unabridged interview to Science Fiction Chronicle that year, which, according to the website was 1997. Not my first WisCON, I actually attended WisCON for the first year in 1984, because Elizabeth A. Lynn was a guest and I talked my father into driving me and my then-boyfriend, Ben K., down to Madison for a day, just so I could see this lesbian writer FOR REASONS (Sorry, Ben!)

The thing is, I also remember deciding to see if I could sell that Melissa Scott interview because a friend of mine who was working at the gay paper as a reporter said, "Since you're going anyway...." so I'm sure I was attending fairly regularly before this, but when exactly I started going regularly, I have no idea. I should ask Laurie Winter if she remembers, because I used to hitch a ride with her, Terry Garey, Rebecca M., and Eleanor Arnason. 

At any rate, on Saturday my first panel was a hybrid one, which I wanted to catch because Naomi was on it. It was called "What I Wish I'd Known When I'd Started" (Writing is implied.)  I have to say kudos to whoever set up their hybrid panel room, because the camera was positioned close enough that I could see everyone--including read their names on the table tents!--and I could hear everything in the room, even the un-mic'ed audience members (even though the moderator very carefully repeated questions from the audience.) I did miss the beginning of this panel because I was figuring out where and when and how, but someone also took abridged notes (like, while it was happening, a kind of live-stream) in the Discord Channel, so I could easily catch up. Naomi and I have been talking a lot about normalizing mid-career slumps and, apparently in the part I missed, she talked about her own. Two of the other panelists were self-published and so the topics hopped all over the place between trad, self-, and hybrid publishing. It was a good panel. Because the tech was so slick, I really felt like I was there.

The next panel I attended was Zoom-only and that one was "The Trans History of WisCON," which I wanted to see because my friend [personal profile] bcholmes was on that. Speaking of nostalgia, the other reason I wanted to go is because I was on a very early trans panel about trans representation in SF/F because my Archangel Protocol books feature a character who is a trans woman (one of the four archangels, actually.) But, this panel has become rather infamous (or famous?) because Charlie Jane Anders, myself, BC, and Elizabeth Bear were on it--and Charlie Jane now talks about it as though it was her and Bear and "some other people." (<--a direct quote from a panel she was on later in the con.) But, I remember it well for a number of reasons, but mostly because of a really profoundly pointed (in a good way) comment from the audience from [personal profile] jiawen in response to Bear's "Well, if you're lacking the right kind of representation, you should write what you want to read!" And jiawen rightly pointed out that not everyone wants to be a writer, but readers still want to see themselves reflected in their fiction. That stayed with me for years and years and years, and I strove to live up to that directive in everything I wrote.

My memories aside, the "Trans History of WisCON" panel was very good, although they had one woman who skirted right up to the edge of being a little bit behind the times, but she was self-aware of her lack of understanding, and that made a huge difference, you know? The rest of the panel was supper fascinating and full of a lot of things I was not obviously privy to throughout WisCON's history. BC suggested that 2000 was the first year she'd attended and that seems unreal to me, because I can hardly remember WisCON without imagining both BC and jiawen there. 

At some point in here, jiawen and I jumped on to jitsi to do our version of barcon, where we hang out and gossip about the con and talk about life, the universe, and everything. It's become a tradition for us at Virtual WisCON and it's surprising how much those kind of things really help a person feel like they're there, at the con, and not just spectating from a vast distance.

Also, later on Saturday evening, I also attended "Tell Us About Your Virtual RPG" for obvious reasons. As anyone who reads my blog regularly knows, I'm in an RPG that has been virtual from the start, some four years ago, with a bunch of folks here on DW.  As I told jiawen later, the panel was interesting (in the non-Minnesotan sense) but not mind-blowing. I find that Zoom panels are often very 101? Like today, I attended a Zoom-only panel called, "Writers Groups and Gaming Groups" because my friend Kristy was on that (and it's something that jiawen proposed based on things that she and I have talked about) and I asked a question about problematic members and what to do with them. And this isn't meant as shade on the panelists, but they all just talked about the easiest solution (which also assumes that all members are expendable, and unteachable which isn't actually always true) which is "just kick them out." Also, as someone who has been the facilitator of a number of writers' groups over the decades that I've been writing, there is no "JUST" in kicking someone out. It's actually always a hard and painful process, especially if your group is full of peers (which mine always are. I don't set myself up in an "instructor" roll, even when I'm the one organizing a group.) If I had been on the panel, I would have liked some frank discussion about how in writers groups (less so in gaming groups,) there are members who have elevated status in the group because they have more publications and that complicates "just kick them out." I mean, in gaming, this is akin to "what if your GM is the problematic one?" 

At any rate, I felt like the Virtual RPG panel also operated on this level, which was kind of Virtual RPGs 101. Which didn't make it a bad panel, I just didn't feel like I'd learned much or heard anything fully new attending it. Although, the Virtual RPG panel did have an interesting discussion about how to deal with maps, mini figs, and the like, virtually, but it got more technical than I was interested in since I'm (so far) never the GM in these games. 

On Sunday, today, the only thing I did was attend the Gaming Groups/Writers Groups panel, which, as I note above, did not knock my socks off, but neither was it a complete waste of time. I'm trying to decide right now if I will go to the streamed GoH speeches. Rivers Solomon and Martha Wells have not been, so far as I could determine on any of the streamed or Zoom-only panels (nope, I just missed "Healing from Cispremacy"/Rivers and "Intersectional Robots"/Wells), so I may want to go to at least say that I've seen them/heard them talk. There is one gaming-related Zoom-only panel tomorrow, Monday, that I might check out, but probably this it for me?  

I realize that milage varies substantially with Virtual Cons, but I have always loved them. I wish they would continue more robustly than I suspect they will?  I really love not having to leave my house to attend. I can afford SO MANY more cons this way, just in general, and when done right I don't really miss the in-person experience. Like, Discord (which, to be fair, I am deeply comfortable with) can feel like those random hallway conversations and they almost always have channels labelled "bar" or "lobby con" so you can "hang out" there and get something akin to the in-person experience. I say this as an extrovert, who likes people?  So, I don't know. Like, I say, obviously, this is very subjective. I'm a big proponent.
lydamorehouse: void cat art (void cat)
I like the digital con experience a lot. 

I like it for all the wrong reasons, though, I suppose. As I was telling [personal profile] naomikritzer (who was there in-person) what I like about digital cons, especially ones like WisCON where I am not on any paneling, is that I can just attend as much or a little of it as I please. This is always true at a con? But I feel so much less guilt at a digital con when I swan off to go do something else for a day or blow off various standard events, like GoH speeches, etc.

I preface my report with this so that you're not surprised that I barely attended WisCON and,  in the same breath, I then report that I had an amazing time.

I attended exactly two panels. On Friday, I got a DM from [personal profile] jiawen on Discord and we agreed to hang out like we did at the last virtual WisCON. So, I popped into our usual jitsi meet space and she screen shared the "Let's Play" panel. Ostensibly, the panel was about the phenomenon of Let's Plays. If you don't know what a Let's Play is, basically it's watching or listening to someone else play a game. This runs the gamut of video gamers like Markiplier or the infamous PewDiePie to D&D podcast like "The Adventure Zone" to watching Will Wheaton playing board games on YouTube.... and there are a LOT of these types of shows and podcasts. A TON. The panel was meant to be about this phenomenon in general, I thought, but it ended up being hyper-specific to a podcast Let's Play that two of the three panelists were involved in. The conversation was interesting, but I had been hoping for a lot more discussion of the broad appeal of this entire genre. 

For once, on a WisCON panel, I kind of wanted the 101 version of this panel. But, alas.

Rachel and I still had a lot of fun using our private jitsi channel to comment to each other. As I joked to her, we were like the two women in the very back, by the door, having our own whisper conversation which is totally a Con Type, and, as a bonus, we disturbed no one since we weren't even on a public channel.

We chatted and gossiped a ton afterwards. These kinds of panels always makes us reflect on the Star Trek:RPG campaign that we are both involved in, so that was great. 

I dipped my toes into various threads on the Discord, but I never found a conversation that I felt compelled to do anything more than glance at and lurk around the edges of. I always like to read through the books and reading channels to see what people are recommending, for instance. But, I have only been reading manga lately and that never feels appropriate to add to books and reading, since most people consider anime and manga its own channel and this year WisCON didn't have a separate channel for either of those.

I also dropped my link into the Dreamwidth panel in the hopes of enlivening the discussions and connections here. *Waves* at anyone who might have followed me due to that.

I skipped Saturday, but yesterday I did another jitsi meetup with Rachel. This time we watched "The Social Contract for Tabletop Play." This one was quite good. I was impressed with all the panelists. I am not *as* much of a gamer as you'd think given that these were the only two panels I managed to attend, but it was more that I probably wouldn't have remembered to go to any, if Rachel hadn't prompted me. And, I have, in the last couple of years, become more and more interested in returning to gaming, even more than the one TTRPG that I am involved in. So, I mean, this wasn't JUST me following Rachel around to her interests entirely, either. 

That was my con? It probably sounds like absolutely nothing at all, but, even in Real Life(tm), I am not great about con attendance unless I'm scheduled to be on a panel, so it's always amazing to me the ways in which this felt exactly like being there in person often does. I mean, I missed all the cool parties, saw almost no paneling? But, yeah, I probably would have done the same in-person, anyway? So....

I had a good time, regardless.

How about you all? Did you have a good weekend? Anyone at the con in-person? Other digital experiences?
lydamorehouse: (Default)
 I am attending the Low-Key Virtual WisCON this weekend. 

The first thing I want to say is that I'm super grateful WisCON pulled together a virtual part of their Gathering. I have really come to love virtual gatherings? I suspect I am in the minority about this. But, I like being able to do all the things at home, on my own time, without all the expense. I'm not a fan of hotels? I like traveling, generally, but often hotels are my least favorite part. 

Plus, I know a lot of work goes into these things, even the spontaneous things. A LOT.

All of it unpaid.

That being said, I am finding kumospace kind of daunting and strange. 

Kumospace: Game-ified Zoom
Image: Kumospace, the Game-ifed Zoom.

I went into an empty room this morning and took a picture of what it looks like (with the map functionality pulled up.). Someone went to a lot of trouble to design these rooms to look like various parts of the Concourse Hotel. This is the Governor's Club. Apparently, this is similar to something else that people were more familiar with? I had never been in a space like this and it took some getting used to having to move my picture around in the space using arrow keys, etc.  Of course, this picture is deceiving, because it normally is filled with other people all of whom appear as these video squares. 

The icon near the bottom of the screen that says "people," can be popped up and you can read the names of the other people in the room, who otherwise only show up as their initials. But, as [personal profile] magenta pointed out, that's only useful if you know the names of the people you want to hang out with. 

The way it works is that as you move your icon around the room, you get within audio range of your fellow con go-ers, much like "real life." You hear people better when you are closer to them. People can form clusters of chatter, or move away and have more private chats.

Only, I found myself talking to myself as my icon moved around saying things like, "God, how do I get this thing to stop moving? Who thought this was a good idea? Do I hate this? I think I hate everything about this," people would suddenly hear me and respond! I found it kind of a new sort of virtual hellscape? Like the opposite problem of Zoom's "you're muted!" Except it was, OMG, you can hear me?? There is a mute option, as well as a way to turn your camera off. But, the default is to start with all of this on!

It... takes some getting used to. I mean, all of this sounds like complaining, but it wasn't terrible? I ended up talking both to Magenta and to Orange Mike... as well, as meeting some new people, which was cool. But, I could immediately see how this operation might take a lot of literal bandwidth as well as a certain amount of social bandwidth. In a lot of ways it does function more like a real party, but some of us were never super comfortable at real parties partly because they require you to physically move away from people you're no longer interested in talking to and that seems so rude? 

I was a little surprised that there wasn't a corresponding WisCON Discord, like last year. And... then someone spontaneously made an unofficial one. So, I've been on that as well today. I've decided to host a Zoom party -- because what is a con, without a "secret" pro party?? Only, this one isn't a secret at all, since I posted about it in the #writers channel of the Discord and added the information to the spontaneous paneling sheet. I may regret offering to host a three hour Zoom? 

I haven't tried to attend any of the scheduled virtual events. I will let you know if I get to any of them today.

I want to underscore that, despite the weirdness of this, I am enjoying it. I am very comfortable in virtual spaces. Discord is my home away from home and even though I find large parts of kumospace very WEIRD, I also am an old cyberpunk writer? I am always down for trying to figure out the advantages of a new system. 
lydamorehouse: (Default)
For whatever reason, my first day at WisCON was my best day at WisCON. That's not to say that I had a bad time the rest of the weekend, more that I kind of mostly didn't participate? Or... was very random in my participation level?

I did end up having lunch with [personal profile] jiawen and [personal profile] naomikritzer, on jitsi, which was lovely, but I didn't do a lot of other con events on Saturday. In the morning, I wandered around the various Discord channels, but never really settled into any particular conversations. I listened to people discuss the merits of Clarion on the # writers-octarine, but I mostly lurked because the time for which Clarion would have been helpful for my career is kind of passed... and when I did know a lot of people still going to the workshop, there were still two of them (East and West)--so that was some time ago. I bring this up because I found most of the online conversations I dropped into to be like this? Like, people were saying interesting enough things, but I didn't manage to connect to anyone for whatever reason.  The opposite was true with the hang-out. I'm swapping manuscripts with a woman I met there, already. But, this may be a function of a couple of things for me--namely, my age. I am an oldster, for the Discord crowd.  But, also I am the kind of extrovert that makes face-to-face connections far easier than I do text based ones.

I didn't manage any panels until Sunday, but in all fairness that happens to me at Real Life (tm) cons, too. I guess I'm glad that I didn't end up paying the highest tier price for the con, if only because otherwise I would feel guilty that I didn't manage to do more with it.  I definitely felt that  what I got out of the con equaled or exceeded what I paid for, and, in my case, that wasn't nothing.

It is a little easier to wander away from the con, alas. I probably would have been busier at the con, but two weekend nights randomly became family game nights at home. I would have loved to have done a few more meet-ups, but so it goes.  Part of this, for me, is figuring out what I like in an online con, too.

I still say it was well worth it, and I'm very grateful that [personal profile] duskpeterson sent me a link to other online cons that are planned this year, because I am signing up for All The Cons!  (For others looking for the info, it's in the comments of my first WisCON report.) 

Otherwise, our Memorial Day was pretty rainy here, at least in the morning. I did do a little social distance hanging out in the backyard with a friend which was great until he got called back to work.  

How about you? Do anything special for the holiday? How was YOUR WisCON, if you went?





lydamorehouse: (Mistaken)
Yesterday evening, we decided to order pick-up from Taste of India (one of our favorites) and play board games. My family adores Trivial Pursuit because it always ends up making us laugh hysterically over dumb things.

Willow, it turns out, just likes the box.

cat in a box
Image: smol black cat sitting in Trivial Pursuit box.

It was otherwise a fairly social day for me. On Friday, I have a regular Zoom with my friends who are a group of writers that I used to meet with at a coffee shop. In the middle of that, I ended up texting back and forth with [personal profile] jiawen about WisCON and so we hopped on to jitsi to catch up on stuff and we ended up watching the Opening Ceremonies together. That was pretty fun and not unlike going to the opening ceremonies with someone in Real Life (tm).  Hopefully, if things work out, I'm going to have a lunch with her and some other regular WisCON folks today in an attempt to recreate the experience of wandering down State Street with a bunch of folks you met at the hotel lobby. (Though, ideally, to recreate that, we should probably end up with too many people to reasonably get seated together and then dither for several minutes about what kind of food people want.) 

Other than watching the Opening Ceremonies, I didn't do much with WisCON yesterday. Hopefully, today I can try a few more things. 

lydamorehouse: (Default)
 As an old cyberpunk writer, I have to say that I'm deeply fascinated by how online communities are built and how things like Virtual WisCON work/don't work.  

So far? I'd say that it's working for me, on the whole. 

Yesterday, I interacted with the con in a number of different ways. I hung out on a couple of different channels on Discord, I 'went' to the You Tube stream of Rebecca Roanhorse's reading and Q&A, and joined a spontaneous jitsi meeting for writers.  I will detail my experience with each, below.

Discord:  I should preference any discussion about my interactions here by saying that I am an experienced Discord user. I have been on it for a couple of years already, having shifted to Discord to chat with a friend when Skype started acting up for her. I've created my own servers and joined existing ones. My profile on Discord is fannish, because that's exclusively what I use Discord for. My son uses Discord even more than I do, using the voice channel option to talk to friends, etc. So, even if I didn't know how to use a Discord function, I have another expert in the house.

So, my experience might be a little different from others, because I'm extremely comfortable reading and participating in conversations on Discord.

When you click on the WisCON link, it automatically dumps you into the "new arrivals" channel.  From there you can navigate out to other channels. I did what I always do when I'm new to a Discord server, which is I immediately went to read their rules or code of conduct channel, because some servers are very strict about keeping channels on-topic and I want to know what the culture is, obviously. 

WisCON seems pretty chill about the channels being on-topic. Administrators and moderators show up on your feed in a different color and I didn't notice one monitoring any of the chats I checked into, with the exception of # lobby-con.  Interestingly, I had my best experience in the lobby. I actually did that thing that happens at cons, where I happened to be in the channel when a couple of people I know dropped in an said hello.  So, I actually chatted with them (and a few other people I didn't know) about the Madison farmer's market, cheese curds, and life.  So, that felt very much like Con, honestly. 

The other channel I lurked on was # books-and-reading and read/"listened" to a conversation about the anti- culture of fan writing fandom. That one ended up feeling a bit cliquish, honestly? One of the users broke into the conversation to write something like, "If this were real life, I'd introduce [name 1] to [name 2]..." which is good socialization in real life, but on-line had the weird effect of making me, as a lurker, suddenly feel like I was intruding on a conversation between friends? The conversation then very much devolved into people they had in common, the places they lived, etc., and so I left the channel.  I mean, this is the sort of thing that happens at a con? But, it's different on-line because Discord does not let you know that people are 'in the channel' and not active. The only way you know someone is part of the "conversation" is if they post something.  So, this person couldn't have known that I was lurking and that I suddenly felt a little awkward when it was clear they were all real-life friends?  In other servers, this is where an active mod would come on and ask people to either stay on topic or move to a socialization channel. But, WisCON seems to be going for a very organic, make-your-own con on the fly vibe, which is perfectly okay. Like I say, things like this happen in real-life cons and I don't expect there to be someone on hand there to make sure conversations stay on topic. The # birds-of-a-feather area is clearly supposed to be informal. So, I'm not criticizing, just explaining my experience. Real life cons are like this, too.

YouTube:  So, one thing I really do love about the virtual con is that I have my phone set to beep me when WisCON sends out a notification of an event. I was in the middle of a late dinner when Rebecca Roanhorse started her reading, but I was able to jump in online about fifteen minutes in. I went to the Discord and went to # links-to-streams and clicked through to the reading there.  

Watching that reminded me that I'm not actually a giant fan of readings, in general.  But, I LOVED the Q&A session, so that was worth it.  Tempest did an excellent job as interviewer/moderator, IMHO.

I honestly thought the YouTube thing would be weird/distancing, but it was fine.  

Jitsi:  There is a section of the Discord for meet-ups spontaneously generated by anyone. It is in the # spontaneous programming channel. A con-goer named 'W' posted that they were hosting a jitsi for writing, and I asked if it was a hang-out for writers or if we would be hanging out and writing. Since it was at 10 pm CST, I did not feel like I could stay up to silently writie, so I was happy to discover that W was planning on conversation unless people really wanted to write together. I had a little trouble joining it because I wanted to switch over to my new iPad and for some weird reason clicking through from Discord didn't launch my app and so it never properly connected my microphone? But, when I opened my app and plugged in the jitsi address it worked perfectly, so whatever.

I should also note that I'm also extremely comfortable on jitsi as it is the video-conferencing option of choice for my regular RPG group. So, it was weird for me to have so many problems connecting.  I blame my own unfamiliarity with my new tech, the new iPad. 

Jitsi is just like zooming or Google hanging out so I had a lovely time chatting with my fellow writers in the meet-up.  We all used the chat function to exchange Twitter handles so now I'm Twitter friends with a half-dozen new people, which is wonderful.  By CHANCE I ended up in a room full of people who either loved cyberpunk or quirky religious stuff and so I did a thing I never normally do when not on panels, which is I pitched my own writing. I had the very weird experience of people saying, "Oh, I've heard people talking about Archangel Protocol before," which... only at WisCON, because, seriously, no one else has ever heard of me.

I have really discovered that I have no problem whatsoever connecting with virtual strangers on the internet any more than I do in real life. This is where being an uber-extrovert comes in handy. 

So, I ended the evening feeling like WisCON was a really fun con to be at virtually. It will be interesting to see how today progresses.

I wonder, however, how other people are doing with it? 
lydamorehouse: (Default)
I signed up for WisCON this year, so I am technically there right now.

As I was telling someone, I have been a Discord user for some years as I have a friend in the UK with whom I do the majority of my chatting with via Discord. I have a habit of keeping it on in the background so I can be poked whenever my friend is online, so I'll probably technically be more available at this con than any that I have ever been to before. Especially, since I also have the app on my phone. Feel free to send me a private message if you want to chat. This is me: lydamorehouse (she/her) #3291

I will be very curious how this will play out.

Discord seems to be the only place that things are going to be interactive. Maybe, since I'm not sure what is meant by 'streams,' in the information I was sent today. Otherwise, I guess I'll be watching YouTube videos with the rest of you? I get why WisCON isn't going zoom, though, since that's a problematic app and someone would have had to pay for a license if they wanted anything longer that 45 minutes and a certain number of people. 

I'm open to the whole thing, though. Should be fascinating, if nothing else.

lydamorehouse: (more renji art)
I missed a lot of the excitement this weekend over WisCON's harassment subcommittee's decision because we were in a small, resort town in Wisconsin enjoying our friends' cabin at Crooked Lake.  I took some awesome photos, but the uploading thingie here on LJ is still being stubborn so I may have to point interested parties to another site.  The lake was ice cold, but Mason, being Mason, braved it anyway.  I ended up in the water, too, though initially under much duress.

But, because we were away from Twitterverse and the rest over the weekend, a lot of what needs saying abut WisCON's decision has already been said.  I have to admit that I'm far less invested in this, despite knowing Jim personally (he was my agent), because I haven't been a regular attendee at WisCON for nearly a decade.  It used to be one of my favorite cons.  The ratio of writer-to-fan was skewed heavily toward the writer end of the scale and, at a certain point in my career, WisCON was the place for me to meet colleagues, agents, and editors in a relaxed setting.  I suspect that's probably still true, but when I switched to being a romance writer I felt less welcome, though never explicitly so.

So, everything I have to say about this is as a complete outsider. My only point is one of comparison. This year at CONvergence, I had a programming issue come up.  I felt it was handled so professionally and swiftly that I don't even feel the need to rehash the details here, except to say that I wish that WisCON could learn and take notes.  The programming head responded to my complaint within hours of my issuing it (even though it was the day after the con and everyone had every right to be off-the-clock, as it were.)  Not only that, but they had a very clear and firm policy that was expressed in unambiguous language to all parties involved.  There was a clear electronic "paper trail." When it seemed we'd reached an understanding, the programming person basically said to me, "I feel from your previous communication that you consider this resolved, but please let me know if there is any part of this issue that you feel is not resolved.  If you feel it is resolved, we will consider this matter closed."

It was amazing.  It was so professionally handled that I almost wondered if the folks at CONvergence were all required to take conflict management courses.

Having a clear, unambiguous policy was paramount to my feeling satisfied by the concom's response to my issue.  The programming head was able to say, "CONvergence expects x of this kind of panel" and there was no, "but we will review this if y or z is involved."  The hammer came down hard.  In fact, it was so intense I was like, "Uh, I'm not sure..." to which I was given a polite, but firm, "Understood, but these are the rules and we're clear about them, full stop."

Granted, this is an entirely different issue than harassment. But, the fact that this was how a relatively minor programming issue was dealt with, it gives me the sense there are even more clear and firm policies in place for other infractions.  They have a well-thoughtout harassment policy written in their souvenir program, for instance, though I'm not sure how well it would work for WisCON's clientele.  That aside, JUST the way this was dealt with could be a lesson for the WisCON folks, you know?

CONvergence is much, much larger than WisCON.  Not only is it on a significantly larger scale, but CONvergence's mission is very different from that of WisCON.  However, I think that WisCON could take note.  If they survive this particular misstep (and I do have to wonder if they will), I think it could behoove them to talk to bigger, more professionally run cons.  I'm sure a con like CONvergence has to deal with police calls and all sorts of things that a small con might never have to, but I would think that, if anything, this whole sexual harassment issue should show WisCON that maybe being prepared for all future contingencies might be a plan, so that there are clear rules and consequences from the start... for the next problem that comes up, because there will be one.

So, that's my two cents.  There are a myriad of other issues involved that I'm not going to comment on because I'm very much removed from the WisCON community.

With luck, I can get some photos of our trip up somewhere.  
lydamorehouse: (Default)
At first I thought I must be mad to have agreed to host a sleepover while Shawn was out of town on a business trip. Now, I'm sitting in the computer room wondering what the heck I'm going to do with myself all night.

To be fair, this isn't a huge sleepover with countless screaming argonauts. It's just one other boy, someone we've had over before, no less. I've fed them... a lot, actually -- a dinner of corned beef and fixings, desert of fresh raspberry pie and icecream, and now they're munching on popcorn in front of "Ice Age." They're other big plan is to have a pillow fight. Last time, a lamp actually got broken (I know! It was like something out of a sitcom!) but we moved all the breakables into the hallway this time, and everything seems to be going well so far, knock on wood.

Like I said, I think the hardest part so far has been knowing what to do with myself. I was reading for a while downstairs while they were having the first of many pillow fights, and now I'm surfing the interwebs and talking to you.

The book I'm currently reading is GRACLING. It's a fantasy YA about a girl who has been "graced" with the ability to be an a$$-kicking assassin. I'm not wickedly impressed so far, but I can see why it was recommended to me as a follow-up to HUNGER GAMES. Kat is very similar to Katniss, and not just in name, but also in tone. She's very non-emotional, distant, and cold. I suspect that's going to change now that the love interest has made his appearance. We shall see.

Meanwhile, I'm waiting for some graphic novels to show up so I can review them for my new gig. Seems my whole life is about waiting for something to come in the mail... rejection letters, royality checks, books to review... :-)

Speaking of all that I was saddened to hear about Realms of Fantasy and Dreams of Decadence folding (again.) My very first short story sale was to Dreams of Decadence, and I never managed to crack Realms. (I'm such and AWFUL short story writer, really. It's sad.) Still, like a lot of people I entertained the idea of buying them from Warren Lapine for a buck. Seems like kind of a deal, unless you consider there's probably accumulated debt, etc. Oh, yeah, and the fact that I know absolutely NOTHING about running a magazine.

And WisCON actually disinvited Elizabeth Moon, eh? Wow. I know there's talk out on the interwebs about WHAT IT ALL MEANS in terms of setting a precident, but I don't see how they could do otherwise. I guess the SF3 membership voted to disinvite her, and, frankly, I'm not sure she's a good WisCON fit because the thing that's struck me about all this is that she's offered no apology, explanation, or any kind of attempt to engage people in a discussion about her post. In fact, she deleted other people's comments. I'm sure that was an attempt/hope to make it all go away, but that REALLY doesn't jibe with WisCON's sense of discourse, you know what I mean? (And it's not really very realistic about the way fandom works in the Internet age, either.)

Looking back on this (but more its predecessors), I hope that if I ever find myself in the center of any kind of fail storm that I have the sense to shut up, listen, learn, and apologize. I don't think that it's wise for us, as writers, to walk on eggshells on matters of race, class, religion, politics, or any other hot button issue. Science fiction is one of the few genres where we push boundries -- sometimes into uncomfortable maybe even sharp edges, and I think that one of the fallouts is that we f*ck up sometimes, even when we have the best intentions.

Of course, if you say stupid things and stick by them, there are consequences. I'm not sure I can avoid the stupid, so my best bet is to try not to be hateful, and, for god(dess's) sake if I come off that way, apologize.
lydamorehouse: (Default)
I think the heat and humidity melted my brain. It certainly ated my ability to do much other than lay around yesterday after Eleanor, Mason, and I hit Como Zoo. It was actually pretty pleasant walking around for the most part, but we luckily gave up before 2:00 pm when the humidity, etc., became soul crushing.

It was quite fun to show off the new interpretive center, tropics trail, and fern room to Eleanor who had not been to Como since all those big changes. It's funny the sort of vicarious pride I have. I didn't build it, after all. But I think it's getting to share the joy of discovery. We got to the big cats by early afternoon, and the Siberian tiger was making "sick cat" moans (or perhaps roars, but they really sounded a lot like what my cats do right before they hork up a hairball.) The osterich also looked pretty miserable, but the giraffe and primates couldn't have been happier. I had been hoping the polar bear exibit would be open but I guess we came a month too early. We also missed out on the butterfly garden, though they had the tent set up. Alas.

I also didn't get much writing done yesterday because we're such complete luddites that we have no central air (no cable, and no wifi... what, am I living in the Stone Age? Yes, I am.) It was too hot to even consider lugging the window air-conditioner out of the attic, so we all just collapsed on the bed and tried not to dehydrate on the spot. Now that it's a bit cooler, I think we'll plan ahead. If this is what May is going to be like, I dread June, July and August.

However, by sitting absoultely still with a fan pointed at my body, I was able to get some reading done. I finished PRETTIES, the second book in Scott Westerfeld's UGLIES series, and ran over to my shelf (despite the sudden burst of sweat that caused) and picked up SPECIALS. This is a great series; have you read it? It's a YA, but it's really very good science fiction (which I would expect from the author of EVOLUTIONS DARLING, among others.) Westerfeld is someone who has one of those literary voices that I just sink into, you know? I'm usually a very slow reader, and I've been pounding through this series. I did find an adult series of his at a used bookstore that I initally bounced off, but I'm looking forward to trying the books again once I finish these.

I'll miss you all at WisCON, though I think I'll be there next year. Perhaps by myself, though figuring out the logistics of this maybe somewhat difficult. I'm thinking that Shawn and I will bring Mason down to grandma and grandpas as usual, and then I'll abandon Shawn and family for a day and one evening (so like, I drive down early Saturday morning, and then drive back Sunday morning) so I can at least attend one day and still get some time in over Memorial Day weekend with my folks. At WisCON I'll need to crash in someone's room, but I have a year to make such arrangements if we decide to do it this way. It's better than nothing, and I will have a science fiction novel to promote, as RESURRECTION CODE will be out by then (it should be out this December, in fact.)

I've been chatting on line with someone who will be doing the Madison as setting panel (my books are mentioned in the description,) and it made me all nostalgic to go. Also, I got invited to participate in another MIND MELD conversation/discussion and suddenly I didn't feel quite as ostracized by the SF community as I sometimes do. What's funny to me is that it's really all about publisher's labels. I've always had romance in my books and fantasy, and Tate's books just capitalize on what was always there --- but the spine says romance and that's that. Locus doesn't even note when my books come out any more (though to be fair, they did review the first few Tate books and the Many Bloody Returns anthology I was involved in.)

Sigh.

Poor me, I guess. ;)

The point is, I miss WisCON and am starting to feel ready to go back. I only hope they'll have me.

Swamped!

Jan. 26th, 2010 11:23 am
lydamorehouse: (Default)
If I'm not keeping up here, it's because I'm falling behind in real-life (tm).

First of all, I know it's Tuesday all ready, but I have to tell you about my weekend. It was awesome. Mason decided that he'd really like to have a read-a-thon. It was not difficult for him to convince his two moms that it would be really lovely to spend the day in bed reading (or, in my case, writing,) only getting up for necessities and the ocassional video game. I spent the entire day working on a proposal for a new adult series for Tate -- I'm trying to have a couple to give to my agent so my editor will have a lot of varied options to choose from (and hopefully like one of them). For a snack we had popcorn and soda... in bed! How incredibly decadant and wonderful was that??

Sunday we were supposed to have a friend over for dinner, but Shawn was starting to catch cold (not awesome.) BUT, we ended up inviting our nephew Jon over for porkchops and fried potatoes and he stayed until midnight talking about STAR WARS (and the original Star Trek series which he just finished watching.) Once again... awesome.

But then Monday hit hard.

Like I posted on Facebook it was a "Monday... with benefits" (of being screwed.) I got into "the office" (Amore Coffee) to an e-amil from my editor. We've been going back and forth on a scene in Tate's upcoming young adult book and it was clear that I was going to loose my battle... but for the right reasons. Initially, I was really pissed about it. BUT, after a great phone call with my editor, in the end, I realized that my editor was right, and that we were really fighting over two different things. Her issue: the scene didn't work with the characters. My issue: it was funny and I didn't want to loose that. In the end, I realized I could make it funny AND accomodate her issues about the characters.

But it was hard getting there, you know?

Plus, I was feeling a lot of pressure. The time is running out on the RESURRECTION CODE deadline. I think I'm going to make it, but with the time lost doing Tate's stuff I was feeling panicky. PLUS, I got the email that could expect readers' proofs for HONEYMOON OF THE DEAD and I was about ready to scream.

But I did what I often do in these kinds of situations... I talked to Shawn. In the course of explaining everything to her I realized how much I sounded like a big, fat whiner. I have a LOT of work. This is a good... no, incredible thing -- especially in these economic times. "May you live in interesting times," is the curse, right? Well, I realized that for me, it was: "May you have too many books to write."

Sure, it sucks, but it's a good kind of sucking.

But so I've been doing a lot of writing related things. I ended up last night staying up late working on the prequel because I'd spent the day revising that scene for my editor (as well as tightening up a few other bits.) I brought along my readers' proofs to the coffee shop, but I think, instead, I'll work on those tonight. Today is for the prequel. Tomorrow I'll review my proposal and get started on the next one. Anyway, the point was that yesterday I feeling "overwhelmed by the belly," (to make an obscure Spain the Cat referrence) but today I'm feeling energized.

Oh, head's up to all y'all... I'm not going to WisCON this year. We were kind of tardy with the hotel reservation stuff, and the governor's suites are all booked. Also, since RESURRECTION CODE won't come out until next year/late this year, I really don't have a good writing reason to go. (Admit it, WisCON is *not* Tate friendly). Plus, Shawn and I are still trying to make WisCON work for us as a couple. It originally was a selling point to my non-fan partner because it was a weekend were were could drop Mason off at the grandfolks and sneak off to a hotel for "us time." But, in reality, we discovered that's not how it works. I end up feeling pulled between hanging out with my SF friends and wanting be with Shawn. Shawn often ends up alone, which isn't what she signed up for. People always wonder where the hell I've been all con. And I end up feeling like I get the worst of both worlds instead of the best. I think there's a solution to this, but we haven't really had the time to put our heads together about it. Hopefully, next year in Madison!
lydamorehouse: (Default)
I don’t really have much of substance to report from this year’s WisCON, other than to say that I had a really great time hanging out with everyone there. It was especially cool to finally meet in the flesh Lynne and Michael Thomas, my number one fan [livejournal.com profile] xochiquetzl, and reconnect with countless confriends like David Levine and his partner, Charlie Anders and her partner Anne L., Cliff (whose last name I’ve never learned, and see pictures of his fiancée), Warren and Betsy Urbik, Tracy Berg, and, as my local friend Harry pointed out: actually spend time just talking to people I should be able to see every day like all people in the Twin Cities fan/writing community. Plus, I actually met some new people, which is always a bonus.

I have to apologize to everyone who hoped to see me on the Slash 201 panel, but I ceded my seat to Beth Friedman in exchange (I hope) for good con karma. She was one of the people who ACTUALLY got a blank con slate (no computer glitch for her) and she’d been really keen on Slash 201 according to her LJ. I love being on slash panels, but I’ve been granted my share over the years. And, according to Charlie, they used all sorts of phrases I’m not sure I knew: “OC,” etc. Sounds like I’m possibly not ready for the advance level classes. Maybe next year!

So, as for the actual events as I remember them….

Shawn and I dropped little boy off at the grandfolks’ on Thursday afternoon, and then headed for Madison Friday morning. The weather was sunny and cool (my favorite combination, especially for driving).

Shawn and I talked without interruption (wow!) and listened to music on our MP3 player (loudly!) on the way down. I actually thought of a couple of things that I want to add last minute to the latest Tate book. The first is “cow tipping.” I’m sure some of you may have heard that “cow tipping” is a Wisconsin past time. For those of you who have never heard of it, here’s the myth: cows sleep standing up, so reckless youths sneak into the barn late at night to “tip” cows. If you’re from New York you may be asked to participate in this fun event. Don’t be fooled. This is much like hunting “snipe,” a game meant to embarrass city slickers. Cows actually sleep lying down. You can see them doing so in the fields early in the morning. We passed a bunch on our way down to Madison. It reminded me of the time I was asked to go “cow tipping” and was actually led into a pen containing a single “cow.” Yeah, it was actually a bull, and let’s just say my so-called friends found it HI-larious watching me scramble the hell back over that fence. Anyway, I thought it might be fun to have someone from Garnet’s extended family invite Sebastian out “cow tipping” after the wedding as a sort of hazing/welcome-to-the-family joke.

We got to the Concourse hotel way before official check-in, and since we’d asked for adjoining rooms with Sean M. Murphy, we were told we had to wait for housekeeping. I gave my cell number to Ivan, the very handsome in a European-sort-of-way, amber-eyed concierge, and after some fussing around ended up working on the final draft of Tate’s book at Michelangelo’s Coffee shop, where I ran into the WisCON writer’s respite folks which included my former student Gary as well as friends Leah Cutter and David Levine. Since they were clearly all still working, Shawn and I found a quiet table and I plowed through the easy changes. I finished everything that didn’t require major revision by the time Ivan called.

Then I took a shower and the Relaxicon of WisCON truly began. Shawn and I went out to Porta Bella, which is our favorite romantic diner out spot. It’s actually featured in two Garnet Lacey stories, the first of which is the short story “Fire and Ice and Linguine for Two,” and the second is the opening scene in “Dead if I Do” (the book that’s due at the publisher in a matter of weeks). I have to admit that normally, we have had only what I would call “okay” food. We go mostly for the atmosphere, which can be summed up in two words: dark and elegant. It’s really, really DARK in the restaurant and the booths are extremely intimate. This year, however, the food was amazing. I had the goat cheese filled ravioli with chicken and porta bella mushrooms and it was actually one of the best meals we had at this con. Shawn was also extremely happy with the handmade pizza she got. We ate ourselves silly.

Then, we, ehm, went to bed early. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge, say no more, say no more.

Saturday morning was the only day we set an alarm. We headed out to the farmer’s market bright and early around seven o’clock. It was gorgeous. Every year we get three things: two dozen potato doughnuts, squeaky cheese (aka cheese curds), and Amish pocket pies (this year’s choices: strawberry rhubarb and blueberry.) That, along with a café miel from Michelangelo’s, was breakfast. Yum. We strolled a lot and checked out all the flowers and jewelry booths. I made a note that I absolutely HAVE to include the farmer’s market if I get a chance to in later Tate books. Also, I nearly bought a pair of earrings I can’t wear (I’m allergic to metal/nickel and my holes have closed up) because they were made from cool old Soviet coins.

We relaxed (wink, wink, nudge, nudge…) until my panel at 1:00, which was “Endings.” The panel was fine, but I thought it could have been more lively. I blame the subject which really isn’t something a lot of people get really riled up about, you know? Still, I met some new people and agreed to make a book exchange with the moderator (Jim Monroe) who writes apocalyptic, post-rapture fiction, which might be just up my alley.

Shawn and I went to one of the many Indian/Tibetan restaurants for late-lunch/early diner. I had something that nearly rivaled my Porta Bella pasta, which was a chicken, pea, potato curry thing, which I can’t remember anything much about other than “yummy!” (This con was a lot about food for me, it turned out.) We also checked out both of the New Age/Pagan shops on State Street. The one which I base Garnet’s bookstore on is S--, the one just a few blocks from the Capitol, but there’s also a new one a few doors down which we always like to check out as well. We didn’t end up buying much this year (taxes sort of put the kibosh on our usual once-a-year spending spree,) but we did a lot of window shopping. We also had to check out “Soap Opera” our favorite bath shop, and taste test a few of the massage oils.

I ended up going to parties on Saturday night, the most notable being the release party for “Superpowers” a book by David Schwartz, whom I just happened to have met a couple of times here at home – once when I was out being interviewed by Haddyr for the Minnesota Women’s Press, and again when I was dropping off books for WisCON at Dreamhaven. He had a contest for a copy of the uncorrected proofs, which I entered. I am sorry to say, however, that I did not win – as, though I could remember one of the Green Lanterns (amazing given that was a DC question), I flubbed the original line-up of the New Mutants (the only one that came to me was Sunspot, and then after that I drew a complete blank.) I was truly mortified, but as the winner had already gotten a copy of the book, I got it as a consolation prize. Turns out Naomi Kritzer really wants to read it, so I’m going to give it to her first (since I’m such a slow reader, with my dyslexia and all.) I spent much of the rest of the evening feeling deep shame at having been shown up on a Marvel Universe question. Captain America would be so ashamed of me!

Then I danced with some really cool women, whose names and identities are lost in the haze of too much Mike’s Hard Lemonade. We did the Hustle and the steam shovel and should have nailed the dance contest, but I think that died before it had a chance to start (a dance contest at a science fiction con? Can anyone say high school all over again?) I suspect it got more exciting later.

I drifted toward the Tor party as I’d promised Xochiquetzl that I would “flit” with her and [livejournal.com profile] jiawen (as well as meeting up with Charlie and Anne). The Tor party being the Tor party was overcrowded and hot, but I managed to stay and shout at a few friends until I met up with Xochi and the others. I had a great conversation about “The Wire” with former panel-friends from Chicago/Think Galactic, whose names I’ve also spaced on (too much alcohol, damn it!) Plus, I got to chat with former Loft students Tim Mulcahy and Gary (argh! No last names in my head!!) However, it was much good times.

Though I tried to tell Shawn I needed to go attend Sean M. Murphy’s panel on Clichés and Tropes on Sunday morning, she reminded me that I had some revisions to finish on Tate’s novel, so I blew him off in favor of writing. I’m happy to say, I got everything done. The only thing left to do is let Shawn read the final, final draft and then it can go off to the publisher this week! Hooray!

After I finished up the draft and we checked out of the hotel, we stopped by the dealer’s room, and finally had a great conversation with Lynne and Michael Thomas (who had previously found our meeting “anticlimactic.”). I also met Chicago fan/editor Steve (Schwartz? Damn surnames!). I also got to catch up with Warren and Betsy Urbik near their jewelry booth. Xochi joined us, and, as Shawn always calls it, I “held court” for a while, which I secretly always enjoy.

Shawn I left early, missing out on much of the stomach flu glory, though I seem to have had a touch of it this afternoon. I hope all of y’all are doing okay! We dutifully washed our hands early and often and used antibacterial lotion at every turn. Though I was sad to leave before the con was over, it was good to get back to LaCrosse and hand with my folks and Mason. We heard about the tornado that struck close to St. Paul and were anxious to get back to see if the kitties and fish were okay!

You couldn’t even tell there’d been a storm nearby as we came into town. The papers showed houses smashed to splinters, and I thought for sure we’d see downed trees. But, this morning when I was out digging in the dirt to plant seeds, the ground was even dry and hard packed. I don’t know if it even rained here.

However, I should say that everyone was fine, even the new tetra. The kitties had snarfed all their food and looked mournfully at us when we came in, but somehow they survived on those “jungle pouches” of theirs. Most of the plants in the new tank survived, too, though my favorite one got quite yellow. Hopefully, now that the grow light is back on full-time, it will make a recovery. The tetra tank had also lost about a gallon of water to evaporation, but otherwise they seemed no worse for wear. We still seem to have our snail castaways as well.

So, how about you? How was your con? If I mentioned you but flubbed/forgot your surname, feel free to correct my drunken haze! I’d love to be able to say “hi!” next time we meet and remember your damn name.
lydamorehouse: (Default)
This is my formal apology to the programming folks at WisCON. There was a computer glitch, and my schedule is, as follows:

Saturday, 2:30-3:45 P.M.
Title: Here's Where The Story Ends
"Maureen McHugh's novels, some say, don't have proper endings; others think that since life goes on past the end of the novel, the ending's a matter of the author's choice. We'll discuss where to end a novel, how much denoument to give the characters, and other questions of wrapping things up."

Saturday, 9:00-10:15 P.M.
Title: Fanfic and Slash 201
Are you a fan of fanfic or slash? Want to have some serious discussions about pairings/genres/etc? This is *not* a panel for people who have no idea what fanfic or slash is. Serious discussion of fanfic and slash communities and the stories themselves will be discussed here.

I've apologized to Lori Selke, but I'll repeat what I said here, in public: I'm sorry that I posted my programmming problems on LJ. However, as I said in the comments of the previous post, this year has been particularly snarly in terms of getting readings, party rooms, etc., and I'm really not used to that from WisCON -- which remains one of my favorite conventions anywhere in the world.
lydamorehouse: (grinch)
I just got my final programming from Wiscon and here it is....





What? You see a whole lot of nothing, well, that's because that's exactly what I've been scheduled for. I got panels, no party, no reading, nothing.

That's a whole lot of awesome. (sarcasm.)

Hooray!

Apr. 24th, 2008 09:21 am
lydamorehouse: (Default)
I'll be at WisCON after all. We got the date of Mason's BFF's party wrong, because I'm a big dork and forgot that WisCON is actually the weekend BEFORE the 31st.

Hooray!!! Or as we say in Wisconsin, "Yippee-skippy!"
lydamorehouse: (Default)
...but apparently due to a miscommunication, Wyrdsmiths won't be having its annual Sunday night party at WisCON. I'm of two minds about this. The front part of my brain is sort of disappointed. We usually have a pretty good turn out, and have, in the past, used the party as an excuse to hand-out a free self-published sampler of our members' work (ala New Wyrd and Tales from the Black Dog.) Without a party, there's really no point in going to the effort -- not to mention the expense -- of producing an anthology/sampler.

The back part of my brain is fairly relieved. The anthology is a lot of work, although, admittedly it's not usually work that I do -- that burden usually falls to Sean M. Murphy and Bill Henry. But, this year it would have required me to actually write something as my coffers of unpublished shorts is completely empty. Writing short stories is something that I really struggle with -- and it usually takes me a long time to write one that I'm satified with. So I always hesitate at the idea of "giving away" something that hasn't gone to market, because, well, I not only do I tend to work really hard on the story that appears in it, but I also have to pay to produce our sampler and my short stories sometimes actually sell, and thus make money for me.

The party is also usually a lot of work -- again, something I have to admit usually falls on other people's shoulders, although I have taken part in a few last minute shopping ventures with fellow Wyrdsmiths. And, of course, I try to be the hostess with the mostest (although that's not usually a lot of work for me, either).

On the flipside, having an annual Wyrdsmiths party means there's at least one party venue when friends know where to find me "after hours." Because Shawn and I have made WisCON into our once a year vacation-without-the-kid, I've noticed a tendency in me to simply disappear after my final panel of the day and thus I end up inadvertantly making myself inaccessable to people. This year, at least, I'm somewhat required (or at least expected) to attend the release party for PERIPHERY, the erotic science fiction lesbian anthology that will be debuting at WisCON in which I have an AngeLINK story. So, I guess what I'm saying is look for me there.

As usual, I will not be attending the SIGN OUT.

We just can't stay the extra hours on Monday -- not with a little boy to fetch and grandparents (my folks) to rescue. :-)
lydamorehouse: (Default)

We’re home safe and sound and now I’ve had time to reflect on the con and whatnot and I thought I’d do a quick write up. 

 

Shawn and I dropped Mason off at his grandfolks’ on Thursday night.  I should mention that as we left I discovered one of the tetra plastered to the bio filter quite dead and, upon closer examination, I noticed that the entire pod developed spots overnight.  I dosed the tank with PemaFix and left instructions with the house sitter to continue the meds.  Even so, I figured we’d come home to a dead tank.

 

We left in high spirits despite all that.  Shawn had wisely bought Mason a portable DVD player and we brought along all his favorites.  It made the trip really smooth. 

 

After spending the night in LaCrosse, Shawn and I headed off in the morning.  Last year, my folks reported that there were a few tears of missing ima and mama, but this time on Friday morning Mason looked at me (shortly after I told him he could not have chocolate sprinkles for breakfast) and asked, “Shouldn’t you be going to Madison now?”  Clever boy knows gramma’s a softie and the sooner the parents are off, the sooner the party starts.

 

We got to con early, but the hotel was able to get us in early.  Shawn always books us in the governor’s suite and I have to admit it’s a luxury I enjoy.  Chocolates on the pillow and access to the club with its continental breakfast and other goodies.  I’m telling you, rich people get all the perks.

 

My first panel wasn’t officially a panel at all.  It was the mid-career writers’ reception.  Naomi Kritzer was the official facilitator, but she’d asked me to be there to keep things focused on our secret agenda, which was to have this be the shop-talk version of the mid-career writers’ gathering.  It went well, but as no one really knows about this option yet, and they set it up so early in the con schedule (actually a good placement as the other one is traditionally at the end, but people wouldn’t necessarily have known to come early for it) it wasn’t extraordinarily well attended.  Hopefully, as people find out about it, we’ll get a bigger turn out.

 

Shawn and I went out to Porta Bella for diner.  We had a great time despite the fact that every time we go we’re struck by the fact even though the place has awesome ambiance, the food is startlingly mediocre.  We took advantage of the darkness to make lots of googly-eyes at each other and spend some much needed grown-up time together without the kidlet.

 

Fade to black…

 

The next morning, I had “Explain Slash to Me” at the ridiculously early hour of ten a.m.  Sharyn November <http://www.sharyn.org/> (editor, Firebird Press) was the moderator and that was a trip.  She ran the panel with an iron fist (to be polite.)    That being said, I felt it went better than panels like this has in the past, possibly _because_ Ms. November kept the audience participation to a minimum.  As much as I love hearing about all the various kinds of slash out there, sometimes that’s all the panel ends up being – an evangelical “witness” session for slash… so maybe her aggressive approach to moderation worked in this instance.

 

After lunch break, where I got to hang out with Anne Harris and Eleanor Arnason, I moderated “Sexism: A Spotters’ Guide.”  Frankly, I was dreading this and thought I might have to play the WisCon Drinking Game, wherein you take a swig of something any time someone mentions a feminist buzzword, ala. “Patriarchy.”  I would have gotten lightly buzzed at this panel, but I think we ended up having an interesting discussion if only because at one point I broke and got my media fandom all over the nice feminists.  I felt a little bad for Graham Sleight (SF critic, <http://www.gsleight.demon.co.uk/>), the token SNAG (sensitive New Age guy, although he was really more a SFG, sensitive feminist guy), but still.    And despite my snarkiness, I actually learned some cool things about language from our resident linguist, MJ Hardman (oh, what a ironic surname that is, isn’t it?)

 

Speaking of which I was actually in the company of a woman whose surname appeared to be “Mankiller” at the BroadUniverse rapid-fire reading, where I read a short snippet of my new-ish messianic chick-lit (novel?  Short story?) “The Second Coming of Emily.”  I actually wrote a little bit more on that and am seriously thinking about turning what I have into a chapter for Wyrdsmiths.  The other readers were the usual mix, which is part of the fun of the BU reading… it’s always a complete mixed bag.  I fell in love with Jennifer Pelland’s (SF/F author, <http://www.jenniferpelland.com/>writing all over again when she read a little bit of what I called her, “Elephant Man story.”  I begged her for the full version and I believe she said it would be out in Helix Magazine some time soon, so watch for that.

 

Shawn and I spent Saturday night in… wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

 

Sunday morning was the “Transsexuality as Trope” panel, which given that a surprising number of the panelists weren’t quite sure how we ended up on the panel went pretty well.  I made, perhaps, the worse personal mistake of my life (and one that may guarantee that I will never moderate the T panel again,) when I used the wrong gender tag to refer to one of our panelist.  She was very kind when I apologized profusely afterward, but I felt like, as they say in England, a “right prat.” 

 

Despite my personal snafu, the rest of the panel went well. E. Bear and I scuffled it up a little, but the dust hardly even flew (which is too bad in a way, since, as I have said, I rather enjoy fighting with her.)  The panelist I enjoyed the most was Charlie Anders (author, co-editor of Girl Geek, <http://www.charlieanders.com/>), who had some awesome ideas for stories that might include historical T characters.  She sent me the links to their wikipedia page –

 

I’m actually doing a little thinking about this challenge, since I have never set out to try to write a T story and there really do seem to be a dearth of things out there -- good or bad.  Plus, I’ve always loved a good spy story and maybe I can science fictionalize some of the bits of these people’s lives… like it might be fun to do a “send up” of the classic Amazonic “utopia” and have a trans character infiltrate that culture.

 

Anyway, the next panel was the BSG one and it also went well, but it was clearly one of those topics where I thought we could very easily have talked for six hours instead of one.  We hardly spoke of Starbuck at all, but Jef Smith gave me the link to a great new time waster, the LJ community What_The_Frak? <http://community.livejournal.com/what_the_frak/profile> I’m totally planning on joining up (actually, I already sent in my request and am waiting for approval) and spending all my writing time yakking about BSG.

 

The only party I attended was the Wyrdsmiths’ on Sunday night, but I stayed up until the last swan sang at 2:00 am.  I got a chance to hang out with

[profile] charliegrrl

 and one of her partners, Annalee Newitz (Wired editor and much, more <http://www.techsploitation.com/>), whom I also had the pleasure of “debating” on the BSG panel.  They introduced me to all of their awesome friends who I’m deeply honored liked me just as much as I liked them (or at least made me feel that way.)  We spent a lot of time fondling my monkey (long story) and making up the “two a.m.” panel ideas, like, “Animals: How They Get High” and other such silliness. 

 

 

I drove back home in a sleep-deprived haze, especially since my father had to unexpectedly work on Tuesday so we didn’t overnight in LaCrosse as planned.  As usual, I’ve come back from WisCON anxious to write and inspired to do some good… or something like that.

lydamorehouse: (TDD)

Last night's reading was a mitigated success... thanks to the SF Meet-up folks, most of the seats were warmed by bodies, but half-way through "Fire and Ice and Linguine for Two" I discovered that I was missing a page.  Hard enough that I had to cover for HER, since she's too self-important to come to these things herself.  (Truth of the matter is that I haven't gotten around to getting a new dress for the season, and, well, I've gained a few pounds so the other alternate ones don't fit any more.  So I did a Lemony Snicket and told everyone that Tate couldn't make it due to a series of unfortunate events.)   At any rate, I stumbled through the mishap with what I hope was my usual charm and grace.  The audience was very forgiving and kind, partly, I think as I knew nearly everyone there.  I also had a chance to show off HER copy of the British version of DEAD SEXY, as a carton of books arrived from my agent last night.

Otherwise, I'm frantically getting ready to head down to WisCON.  I should email the other Wyrdsmiths and see if we want to do some kind of group con report on our blog.  I'm planning on bringing my laptop, so maybe if we can find a wireless spot, I can send along updates AS THE NEWS BREAKS.  (!)

Mason is demanding I read to him, so I must go for now.  

lydamorehouse: (Default)

Please Explain Slash To Me
(Reading, Viewing, and Critiquing SF&F)
Saturday, 10:00-11:15 a.m.
Slash fans and authors explain the appeal of their chosen pastime. Why are women in particular so drawn to this form of expression, as readers and writers? What's so special about mucking around in someone else's fictional world?
JJ Pionke, M: Sharyn November, Rebecca Marjesdatter, Lyda Morehouse, Yoon Ha Lee

Sexism: A Spotter's Guide 
(Feminism, Sex, and Gender)
Saturday, 1:00-2:15 p.m.
It's relatively clear what makes a work feminist...relatively... but in these days of more subtle sexism, and required at least lip service to equality, what makes a work non-feminist, or antifeminist?
Graham Sleight, M: Lyda Morehouse,Betsy Lundsten,M. J. Hardman, Lee Abuabara
 
Broad Universe Rapid Fire Reading
Saturday, 4:00-5:15 p.m.in Assembly
Members of Broad Universe read very short selections from their work. (Note: 10-15 members of Broad Universe will read. The group usually includes both well known and beginning writers. This program usually runs about an hour.
Kristine Smith, Jennifer Pelland, Katherine Mankiller, Lyda Morehouse, Sue Lange, Anne Harris, Rina Elson, Jennifer Dunne, Leah Rose Cutter

Transsexuality as Trope
(Feminism, Sex, and Gender)
Sunday, 10:00-11:15 a.m.
Much science fiction and fantasy of recent years deals with changing sex. But it treats it as a trope rather than a process: LARQUE ON THE WING, I WILL FEAR NO EVIL, "Changes," the work of John Varley. While there is no denying the usefulness of transsexuality as a trope in discussing the social construction of gednder, what are we missing by eliding transsexuality's nature as a process?
Jennifer Pelland, M: Lyda Morehouse, BC Holmes, Elizabeth Bear, Charlie Anders

Battlestar Galactica: The Debate
(Reading, Viewing, and Critiquing SF&F)
Sunday, 2:30-3:45 p.m. in Senate A
Is the new BSG the most pro-feminist SF show ever, or is it a secret sexist scourge? Opinions differ -- markedly. So, let's debate! Instead of a panel, this programming item will consist of one pro-BSG representative, one anti-BSG representative, and one moderator.
Jef a. Smith, Annalee Newitz, M: Lyda Morehouse

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
4 56 78910
111213 14151617
181920 21 22 2324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 10:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »